ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I thought it was an interesting talk. Mark me down for Jimmy Stewart style. The video ends right after Dr Sanders speaks, so we don't get any of the Q&A.
Did you have an opportunity to give responses Dr Sanders?
I did not respond to Tony. Again, I have been low-energy the last several days. I thought some of the questions were interesting. People wondered about consumers taking interest-rate risk with ARMs.
I think that interest-rate risk is likely to go wherever the government provides a guarantee that is poorly defended with regulations. That is why the "devil-you-know" strategy has some appeal to me. I worry that if we don't have a system dominated by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the interest-rate risk will wind up in some AIG-like entity that sells derivatives in massive amounts, thinking that interest rates could never behave in some particular way.
But even with that concern, I still prefer having the government attempt to get out of the mortgage guarantee business. The challenge is to stay out of the guarantee business, even if some market participants mess up.