ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


As an aspiring lawyer, I benefit from the availability of unpaid legal internships, but it is interesting to note that the Federal government does not pay for a good chunk of the legal summer programs offered. It is also not clear if these 40 hour per week positions are entirely educational.
What was particularly troubling in the comments attempting defend the minimum wage combined with unpaid internships was the blanket assertion that one was not educational and/or resume building while the other was. Seriously, do they really think minimum wage jobs are not educational and resume building?
I can see how less-educated people can be fooled by the rhetoric into thinking the minimum wage "protects them," but I'm dismayed that the more educated persons typical of interns aren't openly outraged at the constraints those laws raise against them.
Vince, as Bret Maverick's "ol' pappy" used to say, You can fool all the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time...and those are pretty good odds.
For proof of that, click on the link David provides to his earlier post, and read my comment there. You'll find out that it's worse than you think; the interns are actually paying (tuition) for the privilege of working for free.
Wow. Thanks for that, Patrick. Unbelievable-- sadly, I guess it's really not.
Makes me wonder/worry when entrepreneurship will come to be "protected." Seeding my training/consulting business several years ago, I offered free work for reference, track record, and tangible results.
Many of my friends have done the same and I've counseled others to do likewise. I also know it's not uncommon for fledgling models and photographers to trade time for pictures (they call it TFCD, "trade for CD").
Obviously, we all need protection from ourselves and the exploitation we've endured.
Actually, progressives have been lamenting the trend to more emphasis on unpaid internships. The argument goes that working class youths don't have the means of family or other support to make unpaid internships feasible. They see it as a retrograde development of society back to a time when creative pursuits were a plaything of the leisure class, from which were excluded people not possessed of the luxury of thinking about things other than where their next meal (or their next paying gig; dinero=dinner) will come from.
Lori,
I have also argued that unpaid internships are difficult for lower-income people to accept. The solution: allow internships that pay greater than zero but less than minimum wage.
The existence of cheap labor is offensive if there is not also cheap housing. Cheapness on only one side of the ledger shifts the labor-management balance of power even more strongly in favor of management.
I approve more of the apprenticeship concept than the internship concept; with the understanding that the apprenticeship system is under the control of workers, say via a union. Of course the far right lately has been making a bogeyman of "credentialism." Apparently they want all of us to be on the defensive at all times, with no laurels whatsoever to rest on, at any point in the life cycle.
@Lori:
"The existence of cheap labor is offensive if there is not also cheap housing."
So no labor + expensive housing is better than cheap labor + expensive housing? I know quite a few people who would much prefer being paid a little than their present situation.
@Lori
"Of course the far right lately has been making a bogeyman of "credentialism." Apparently they want all of us to be on the defensive at all times, with no laurels whatsoever to rest on, at any point in the life cycle."
As it turns out credentials are often not that useful in determining your success in life. Today, I use in my job almost none of the skills I acquired through formal education or validated through credentials. Looking around, many people have a similar experience. Oh sure, I love being able to think and talk about economics, but given the cost of going to college and credential programs, it is legitimate to ask: "are they an effective way to succeed?" Perhaps there are cheaper more effective ways to get ahead in life.
As for resting on your laurels, the metaphor is very apt: We can't all have laurels. So a more interesting comment would be: What gives you the right to be allowed to rest on laurels that someone else is willing to work hard for? Are you so intrinsically above those other people that you deserve more than they do?