Arnold Kling  

Richard Shelby, New Keynesian

PRINT
Obama's Criminalization of Bus... Orszag on Inequality in Life E...

According to the WSJ's Andrew Ackerman,


The top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee said Thursday he would urge the Federal Reserve to pursue an explicit inflation target, in the face of renewed interest in the idea.

This is exactly what many of the leading academic macroeconomists of the younger generation have said would be the right way to conduct monetary policy. My guess is that they will now wish to re-think their position. How can a self-respecting New Keynesian be caught on the same side of the debate as Senator Shelby?


Comments and Sharing


CATEGORIES: Monetary Policy



COMMENTS (5 to date)
B writes:

I read about explicit inflation targeting when it was still underground. Now it has sold out and gone mainstream. Uncool, man.

Alex Godofsky writes:

No self-respecting macroeconomist would advocate an inflation target over a price level target!

Mattheus von Guttenberg writes:

Is the inflation target 0%?

Charlie writes:

If we add in, catch up inflation as a goal, I'm on board, and so is Michael Woodford.

http://everydayecon.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/why-couldnt-woodford-be-vice-chair-of-the-fed/

Nicholas writes:

[Comment removed pending confirmation of email address and for policy violations. Email the webmaster@econlib.org to request restoring your comment privileges. A valid email address is required to post comments on EconLog and EconTalk.--Econlib Ed.]

Comments for this entry have been closed
Return to top