ARNOLD KLING
October 18, 2011
Democracy Without Government
October 18, 2011
For the Myth of the Macroeconomy File
October 16, 2011
Steven Jobs and Steven Chu
October 15, 2011
Lifted from the Comments
October 15, 2011
The Myth of the Median Worker
BRYAN CAPLAN
October 19, 2011
Quiggin the Pacifist?
October 19, 2011
The Toothpick Problem
October 18, 2011
Tell Me the Growth Rate
October 17, 2011
Rojas' Grad Skool Rulz
October 17, 2011
The Profound Sumner
DAVID HENDERSON
October 19, 2011
Uwe Reinhardt Nails It
October 18, 2011
Krugman on How Blogs Have Changed Economic Debate
October 18, 2011
Great Moments in Labor Supply
October 17, 2011
Free the Nurses--and the Patients
October 17, 2011
More on Kevin Murphy and the NBA


I agree that improvements in education outcomes are likely to be marginal even under the best assumptions. Maybe in terms of efficiency we're pretty much stuck, but let's look at efficiency and equity where I'd argue there is scope for massive reform.
In terms of efficiency, let's wind the clock back 30 years and get the same outcomes for half the real cost per student.
And in terms of equity, as Rueven points out, let's stop subsidising higher education which only reinforces the gap between rich and poor.
When I read papers like that I get the feeling people formally in charge of the problem are way too ensconced in the current system to consider potential solutions that lie outside of it.
I'm sure their results are valid to some degree, but when I think about the world I find myself working in today and the heterogeneous, specialized labor it demands and compare it to the sclerotic school system, I can't imagine the latter turning its wheels fast enough to deal with the problem.
I'm optimistic about the future of education, but mostly because I think there are plents of ways to go around the current system.
Brenner's words brought back heretical thoughts that I often have: most progressives like income inequality--as long as it is the right kind. If people with more schooling make more money, that is only right. Someone who dropped out of high school has no right to expect to get a good job.
Schooling is both a mechanism for "the intergenerational transmission of inequality" and a justification for it.
Education should be more free market, If you advocate vouchers, then the vouchers should be used also by non-college bound students for specific job training.