BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


You really don't think drilling has an adverse environmental impact, or don't care?
"You really don't think drilling has an adverse environmental impact, or don't care?"
You really don't think cost/benefit analysis has a role to play in this issue, or don't care?
On "Drill, baby, drill." ...
I was driving through northern Montana last year - where there is a great deal of oil/nat gas development activity in progress. I stopped by a small cafe in one of the boom areas for breakfast. They had tee-shirts for sale (as well as good food.) My favorite tee-shirt had "EARTH FIRST" printed in big letters. Then, just below that, in only slightly smaller letters, "(We'll Drill the Other Planets Later)".
I bought 5 of those tee-shirts for myself and friends, and I may buy more. Remarkable how drilling inspires all sorts of secondary innovations and economic activity.
Yes energy and food are the bright spots in employment. It seems Julian Simon's Principles still stands.
I think part of the problem might be the correlation issue.
The inter-connectedness of financial markets cause asset prices to move together more often.
The same reasons cause the tides of creative destruction to work the same way.
"You really don't think cost/benefit analysis has a role to play in this issue, or don't care?"
It's really tough to do a cost/benefit analysis when public choice and regulatory capture issues play such a large role in the domestic market. So much of the land is held by the federal government, which makes decisions thousands of miles away from the drilling, with little meaningful local input. And on private land, due to the split estate, the owners don't hold the mineral rights and cannot obtain them. Political rhetoric plays a larger role in domestic energy than markets do.
I enjoy it when your natural undertone of irritation shows thru against doom and gloomers, particularly when your views match mine---which is about 80% of the time perhaps.