ARNOLD KLING
December 5, 2011
Shock Me, Shock Me
December 5, 2011
Today on the Eurozone Crisis
December 4, 2011
What I've Been Reading
December 4, 2011
David Friedman on Consensual Government
December 3, 2011
The PSST Just-So Story
BRYAN CAPLAN
December 6, 2011
Voter Irrationality in Animal Farm
December 5, 2011
My Fourth Statement
December 2, 2011
Seth Roberts on Education and Evaluation
December 1, 2011
Hail IJ: Bone Marrow Sales Are Now Legal
December 1, 2011
Tabarrok's Roadmap Out of the Slight Stagnation
DAVID HENDERSON
December 5, 2011
The Fed's Secret Handout
December 5, 2011
Wolfgang Kasper on the Euro
December 4, 2011
Greenspan on Dodd-Frank: Start Over
December 3, 2011
Greenspan: Let Them In
December 1, 2011
Betty Friedman Nails It
SHARE
Certainly this is a testament to the relative prosperity in the developed world. What is the worst case scenario for students with less rigorous majors? Living in their parents' home or perhaps serving coffee at a starbucks? Compare this to an individual living in rural India or China. Education there is more transparently treated as an investment for financial independence a decent standard of living (not personal satisfaction).
I would encourage potential students considering these programs to instead buy a hybrid or electric car and adorn it with political bumper stickers. They can still signal their conscientiousness and commitment to delaying climate change, but they would be able to sell it if they change their minds to recover some value (something you cannot do with a degree).
More like powerful signalling devices as to one's aspirations to unemployment
On the one hand, these degrees definitely are a sign of affluence and confidence that "things will work out", no matter what happens. On the other hand, they're often a sign of extremely bad advice and counseling, particularly if a kid runs up a lot of debt getting one of these degrees.
In a more formally religious age, these kids would be in seminary school or taking holy orders.
I am studying philosophy: http://andreasmoser.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/ma-philosophy/ - How do I justify that economically?
Andreas,
Many moons ago when I was in school, philosophy was an excellent degree but that was at a time when no one with STEM degrees wanted to work with to work with the toys we all use to type in things here. Desperate employers were looking to anybody who had a BA for "software engineers" to write software for those toys.
My point in the comment wasn't to bash non-STEM majors as it was to discuss the various "studies" majors, and related stuff like "social justice" (yes, there are programs in it, whatever it is), "sustainability", etc. These aren't really "liberal arts" majors in the way that literature, history or philosophy are as much as they're a sort of aspirational degree indicating what sort of person the degree-holder wants to be. They're also a kind of professional major for aspiring activists (which seems to be the only "economic" use for such degrees: get one and a law degree and work as a lawyer/lobbyist for the relevant groups).
But the Church kind of paid for those guys "aspirational" degrees back in the day. They got their money from tithes and offerings. I guess since now we worship the State, the State pays for those guys "aspirational" degrees via tax money?