In the comments, Olof Johansson-Stenman points out an error in my post on his consequentialism study:

The third choice alternative is actually not “The extent to which the
action infringes upon someone else’s NATURAL rights” but simply “The
extent to which the action infringes upon someone else’s rights”, i.e.
in line with what you suggest. (Perhaps Robin Hanson wrote this too
quickly on his blog.)

My apologies, Olof.

Read the rest of his comment, we disagree less than I thought.