ARNOLD KLING
February 13, 2012
Conversation with David Weinberger
February 13, 2012
Regional Variations in the Recession
February 13, 2012
Revisiting Goldin and Katz
February 12, 2012
Limited Liability and Banking
February 12, 2012
What is Bernanke Saying About Housing?
BRYAN CAPLAN
February 15, 2012
What If the Stranger Is a Drowning Child?
February 14, 2012
Krugman, Human Weakness, and Desert
February 14, 2012
A Search-Theoretic Critique of Georgism
February 13, 2012
The Boudreaux Plan to Save the NYT
February 13, 2012
Obamacare Shortages: Why Aren't We Going Sputnik?
DAVID HENDERSON
February 14, 2012
Problems with Henry George's Single Tax
February 13, 2012
How to Cut the Cost of Contraceptives by Regulating Less
February 12, 2012
Happy Birthday, Eugen and Julian
February 10, 2012
W. Allen Wallis: An Appreciation
February 7, 2012
Break the Buck!
SHARE
We really ought to be making a big deal out of ineptness. When one takes it upon oneself to commit trillions of dollars as 'bailouts', taken from a sullen and resentful population hundreds or thousands of miles from the scene of the action, while wagging one's finger saying 'this is for your own good', one had better be right.
The media pumps the idea that things would be worse without the intervention. How, exactly? With the trillions now disposed of, and the economy in the tank, the solution now seems far worse than the problem.
I don't think anyone in Yglesias's camp is relying on Sumner for accusations of Fed ineptness.
What I think they are more likely to do is suggest that the Fed could have done worse than it did. Sumner seems reticent to admit this. They're also going to disagree with Sumner on the wisdom of fiscal policy, given our position at the zero lower bound.
But as far as I can tell, nobody has ever needed the market monetarists to tell them that monetary policy could have been even stronger than it was.
Daniel, Yglesias has as a matter of a fact, actually relied on Sumner for accusations of Fed ineptness.
Of course the Fed could have done worse. Sumner doesn't deny that we're not in a second Great Depression. The fact that they've done worse in the past makes it easy to see how it would be possible to do even worse than they've done this time.
People who suggest that the "zero lower bound" is important are generally exactly the sort of people who have a difficult time seeing that "monetary policy could have been even stronger than it was."
I initially misread the headline as "We are all Sumerians now" and wondered if now we all build ziggurats, wear feathered headdresses, and use a written language mixing Akkadian words with an agglutinative syntax from an earlier linguistic isolate.
Grant, I tried doing all that stuff in 2008, but it just didn't catch on. Maybe Etruscan is the way to go.
@Grant Gould:
So did I! I figured it might have been on purpose since this is the only site I know that has cuneiform at the bottom of the page! :)
Apparently we should be voting Gilgamesh in 2012.