ARNOLD KLING
March 24, 2012
Leveraging and De-leveraging
March 23, 2012
Neuroscience and Ethics
March 22, 2012
Notes on the Phillips Curve
March 20, 2012
Potential Output Straw Man
March 19, 2012
The Speculator of Last Resort
BRYAN CAPLAN
March 26, 2012
We Are So Different
March 23, 2012
The Awful Mill
March 22, 2012
Table of Contents for The Case Against Education
March 20, 2012
Licensing and the Return to Education
DAVID HENDERSON
March 25, 2012
The Problem with a Variable Tax on Gasoline
March 24, 2012
Unintended Consequences of Government Regulation, #93621
March 23, 2012
Nordhaus's Global Warming Graph
March 23, 2012
Bob Murphy on the Heartland Institute
March 22, 2012
Michael Mann: I Don't Argue
SHARE
Doesn't everyone mistrust the basic tenets of democracy? Who is in favor of mob rule, exactly?
It hinges a bit on semantics, since I dont see any actual data being discussed, but something that is 'emerging' in 1978 is entirely congruent with something that is well established a generation later.
It's worth pointing out that our country was founded on a mistrust of democracy. That's why we were created as a constitutional republic. Unfortunately, democratic forces have been eating at the constitution for a long time. If we had less democracy, we would have less government.
The elite are tired of people using democracy to take money from them by force--democratic thugary.
Given the nature of the observation, I think this observation is entirely consistent with Murray: he makes a lot of hay about how the 1970's were different than the 1950's. If you found something like that from pre 1970 I would say it was contradictory. Kaus has been anti-Murray for, well, almost two decades, though half-heartily so.
Reinforces it; but interesting that the theme goes back that far.
Is it just a coincidence that this new concern in the 70s with the rise of the unchecked cognitive elite corresponds to when Tyler Cowen dates the start of The Great Stagnation?
For the first time, the elite is numerous enough to coalesce?
The date of this piece coincides with New Left and Neoconservative talk of a "New Class" of culturally distinct technocrats. I'm thinking of Alvin Gouldner and, say, Nathan Glazer, respectively.
DW: Sort of. I don't think an IQ elite suddenly got numerous, so much as (a) the 1960's and 1970's marked a point where more than ten percent of the nation's youth attended college, and (b) college admission policies reflected meritocratic ideals more than in the past. Lots of really bright boys meeting really bright girls, IOW. Millions of bright boys and millions of bright girls. THAT was new.
Even before Lebedoff, Murray's old co-author Richard Herrnstein emphasized assortative mating in his Atlantic Monthly article "I.Q." in 1971. I recall reading it in the public library around 1973. That article is not online, but here's an article about that article in the Harvard Crimson in 1971:
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1971/9/22/herrnstein-in-the-atlantic-predicts-american/
Another source is Yugoslavian Marxist politician Milovan Dilas's 1957 book "The New Class."
In England, high IQ liberal families like the Darwins, Wedgwoods, Galtons, Arnolds, Huxleys, and Keynes socialized and intermarried from the 18th Century onward. For example, Cambridge professor Richard Darwin Keynes recently died. He was almost an oddity in his family for not having a Nobel prize.
Last a few years has been to Ibiza, so met a person there whose style of presentation is very similar to yours. But, unfortunately, that person is too far from the Internet!...