BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


In what bizarre philosophy can hierarchicalists and individualists be lumped together like that? Has it escaped someone's notice that hierarchy can only exist in a community? An individual treated individually cannot be hierarchically ranked relative to himself.
I can't find data on what % of conservative scientists believe in GCC vs. liberals.
Anyone have any idea?
There's an interesting flip side to the Yale Cultural Cognition Project studies as well, however - framing matters. For example, when increasing the use of nuclear energy is presented as a solution to climate change, as opposed to government action, individualists tend to become more receptive to risks of climate change.
I don't think one simply has to shrug their shoulders at confirmation bias and leave it at that - it means that speakers need to engage with the values of their audiences they intend to persuade. In the case of climate change, it might mean presenting the issue less with a predilection toward central regulation and more toward technological solutions.
Incidentally, this is something I recently covered over at my own blog, from the perspective of risk perception and nuclear energy.