Alberto Mingardi  

Trevor Burrus on Justice Scalia

Milton Friedman on Trumbo... Is David Brooks Right about Ob...

Justice Scalia died on February 13th. For those who knew him, it's a shock. It sounds a bit weird, but I think that it was Bill Clinton who put it best, by saying that "he was so full of life and so vigorous. I thought he'd live to be 100."

Many obituaries have already been published, and many more will be in the next few days. The word "giant" has been frequently used. On a different note, it is somehow uplifting to see how many people (Clinton included) pointed out that Scalia was at a time a forceful defender of his beliefs, and a warm man who befriended intellectual opponents and friends alike. We very often refer to intellectual debates as "the war of ideas." But ideas do not make war; people do. Some of us think that the ultimate test of the strength of their own beliefs is how nasty they can be to those who do not share them. Scalia, a passionate Sicilian, knew the difference between believing in something and simply being partisan.

Trevor Burrus, the managing editor of the Cato Supreme Court Review, published a most thoughtful and learned obituary of Scalia. Trevor maintains that "Justice Scalia was one of the last of a dying breed: an iconoclastic Supreme Court justice with hard and fast principles, a blazing intellect, and the wherewithal to carry an entire school of jurisprudence on his back." He adds, sadly: "In other words, someone who could never be confirmed today, no matter which party nominated them."

Comments and Sharing

CATEGORIES: Obituaries

COMMENTS (1 to date)
Nathan W writes:

I do not feel that it should be expected to refrain from criticizing the recently dead while defenders seek to solidify his legacy (can only one side speak?), for such an important and influential man.

Is "forceful defender of his beliefs" something used to describe someone who impartially dispenses justice?

Conservatives will remain enamoured with the guy for a very long time. He was good for the cause, but that will never be consistent with anything I associate with being a "good judge".

Comments for this entry have been closed
Return to top