Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Arnold Kling More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||
That these insurance companies wouldn't cover children probably seems heartless to many people, but keep in mind that insurance companies would cover any risk no matter what it is if they are allowed to charge a premium that covers the risk. They can't with healthcare because all states have price controls on premiums. Insurance companies have two choices with uncovered children: 1) cover the child and lose a lot of money, then try to persuade the insurance commission to allow a rate hike for all members to cover the loss or 2) deny coverage. As Henderson wrote, it's totally predictable but most politicians didn't want to see it.
fundamentalist is absolutely correct. Many politicians and so-called public servants refuse to realize that companies are in business to make a profit for their owners (shareholders) not to be endlessly benevolent.